EXHIBITS

A New Road 

DNO-0171_Ser025473Bx003Fd34_SLCInterstate5thand6thSouthDedication-002.jpg

Cars line the interstate for the dedication of the Fifth and Sixth South interchange. Courtesy of the Utah State Archives. 

 

Construction Concludes

Construction ended on this initial section of interstate in October 1964. At the time of its completion, planners were already anticipating expansion for the allowance of additional traffic in the face of congestion.[1] 

"Essential to making almost any other future plan you can think of come true is transportation. People and communities on the move and that's the Salt Lake area have to be able to get there. It's as simple as that."

– Salt Lake Tribune, 1964[1] 

The freeway opened a new road for travelers. It opened the door to a new era of urban development and renewal, but as with earlier developments of the west side, this came at a cost.   

Before and After

DNO-0185_UrbanChangeProject-SLC1950.jpg DNO-0185_UrbanChangeProject-SLC2014.jpg

Aerial comparison photographs of Salt Lake City before and after the freeway’s construction. Courtesy of the University of Oklahoma, Christopher C. Gibbs College of Architecture.  

Slum Clearing in the Cities 

The post-war era brought many changes to America’s cities, with urbanization and suburbanization spurring rapid development and a high demand for new infrastructure. This development especially impacted poor and minority communities in the inner cities.[2]   

In practice since the nineteenth century, slum clearing grew dramatically after World War II. The Housing Act of 1949 had subsidized redevelopment projects incentivizing local officials to look at their cities with a critical eye towards economically disadvantaged areas.[3] This led to mass displacement, the lowering of land value, and white flight from areas near the interstates.[4] In the early years of the interstate, the communities of many African Americans and other minority groups were bulldozed in the name of progress.[5] 

In the 1950s and 1960s, Nashville, New Orleans, New York City, Miami, Birmingham, Little Rock, Charlotte, St. Paul, Pasadena, Tulsa, Cleveland, and Minneapolis all had thousands of households displaced by strategic freeway construction that ran through mostly African American and Latine communities.[6] Freeway opposition movements did save some neighborhoods, as in Washington, D.C., and Baltimore, but this were not the norm.[7] 

DNO-0186_SegregationByDesign-Minneapolis1947.png DNO-0186_SegregationByDesign-Minneapolis2006.png

These maps show the development of Minneapolis, Minnesota from before freeway construction to 2006.

Courtesy of the Adam Paul Susaneck, Segregation by Design Project. 

DNO-0134_ LC-USZ62-136079.jpg

Robert Moses, overlooking a model of the ill-fated Battery Bridge, led a number of urban highway projects in New York that faced resident opposition. Courtesy of the Library of Congress. 

 

Urban Renewal Across the Nation 

In the 1960s, New Orleans’ French Quarter and other historically African American communities came under threat by urban renewal (slum clearing).[8] Local preservationists and activists tried to prevent as much damage as possible, but some sections of the community were lost to construction.[9]  

At the 1964 New York World’s Fair, a massive protest tried to influence public opinion in favor of the African American communities that were impacted by Robert Moses’ superhighway projects in NYC.[10] 

 

DNO-0171_Ser025473Bx003Fd106_InterstateSLCSouthTempleConstruction1961-002.jpg

Construction underway on an underpass withing the west side community in Salt Lake City, 1961. Courtesy of the Utah State Archives. 

Salt Lake City’s Urban Renewal 

The west side had been a red-lined community, labeled as “hazardous” to investment due to the racial make-up of the residents. In Salt Lake City the freeway was a first step towards reshaping this community through urban renewal.   

After the first sections of I-15 were completed, rezoning occurred, turning several dozen blocks of land from residential areas into heavy industrial zones. Schools were destroyed, new homeowners displaced, and the homeless population removed.[11]  

DNO-0128_NEWS-SaltLakeTribune1964-09-14-Pg18_AttackingBlightedHousingProblem.jpg

Once a community “coming into its own,” the west side had become “blighted.” The destruction of homes and businesses along the interstate’s path is portrayed as a celebratory part of “urban renewal”.[12] 

DNO-0128_NEWS-SaltLakeTribune1976-12-09-Pg47_TuckedInItsAlmostForgottenCornerSwedeTown.jpg

Newspaper clipping of an article on the Swede Town community from 1976 detailing the communities “fight for survival” in the face of further industrialization of the area. 

Swede Town 

The west side had been home to a wide variety of ethnic communities prior to the interstate’s construction. For economic and class reasons, urban renewal targeted one of Salt Lake City’s largest Swedish communities.[13] The railroad, mining industries, and the placement of the industrial zoning were motivating factors for where I-15 was built.[14] 

Swede Town went from being a boom town in the early twentieth century to being filled with industrial zoning in the 1950s. The area known as Rose Park was once home to hundreds of Swedish families, but the development of I-15 and changes in zoning from residential to heavy industrial decimated the community.[15] By 1976 it had dwindled to just forty families.[16] 

DNO-0171_Ser025473Bx003Fd103_InterstateSLCFreeway1stSouth14thNorth1959-011.jpg

Demolition and tree removal for freeway development at 1st South and 14th North in Salt Lake City taken 1959. Courtesy of the Utah State Archives.

Endnotes:

[1] “Looking Ahead on S.L. Transportation,” The Salt Lake Tribune, October 27, 1964. 

[2] ] Mark H. Rose and Raymond A. Mohl, Interstate: Highway Politics and Policy Since 1939, 3rd ed. (Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee, 2012), 97 

[3] William J., Collins and Katharine L. Shester, “Slum Clearance and Urban Renewal in the United States,American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5, no. 1 (2013): 239. 

[4] Tom Lewis, Divided Highways: Building the Interstate Highways, Transforming American Life (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 2013), 193. 

[5] Robin Faith Bachin, editor, “Race, Housing, and Displacement in Miami,” University of Miami, date accessed June 01 2023, https://scholarship.miami.edu/esploro/outputs/991031504486902976.   

[6] Rose and Mohl, 107-110. 

[7] Rose and Mohl, 109 

[8] Rose and Mohl, 105-106. 

[9] Lewis, 186-190 

[10] Lewis, 193  

[11] “Franklin School Doomed for Highway Project,” Salt Lake Times, January 29, 1965; “S.L. Hears Protests on 7th W. Freeway,” Deseret News, January 22, 1957.   

[12] “Attacking Blighted Housing Problem,” The Salt Lake Tribune, September 14, 1964. 

[13] Jerome K. Full, “Freeway Bid to Save $263,00 for State,” The Salt Lake Tribune, December 12, 1958; “What is an ‘Express Highway’?”, Deseret News, January 15, 1948; Vandra Huber, “Tucked in Its Almost Forgotten Corner, Swede Town Still Boasts of ‘Good Life’,” The Salt Lake Tribune, December 9, 1976.

[14] “S.L. ‘Failure’ Slows Start on Freeway,” The Salt Lake Tribune, January 4, 1959; “7th West Set at S.L. Highway Meet,” Salt Lake Telegram, February 10, 1948.   

[15] Full, “Freeway Bid to Save $263,00 for State.” 

[16] Huber, “Tucked in Its Almost Forgotten Corner.” 

[17] Ted Cannon, “About the Happiest Kid,” Deseret News, June 04, 1959. 

[18] “Franklin School Doomed for Highway Project,” Salt Lake Times, January 29, 1965.